Setup as front page - add to favorites
Your current location:front page >software >The universe-and every thing in it—exists in singu-lar 正文

The universe-and every thing in it—exists in singu-lar

source:Enshenyizhongwangedit:softwaretime:2023-11-30 18:37:47

(63) This is the reading of a common stall copy. Chappell reads -

The universe-and every thing in it—exists in singu-lar

which is no doubt correct, though inapplicable to a rural assembly in our days.

The universe-and every thing in it—exists in singu-lar

(64) Brew, or broo, or broth. Chappell's version reads, 'No state you can think,' which is apparently a mistake. The reading of the common copies is to be preferred.

The universe-and every thing in it—exists in singu-lar

(65) No doubt the original word in these places was SACK, as in Chappell's copy - but what would a peasant understand by SACK? Dryden's receipt for a sack posset is as follows:-

'From fair Barbadoes, on the western main, Fetch sugar half-a-pound: fetch sack, from Spain, A pint: then fetch, from India's fertile coast, Nutmeg, the glory of the British toast.' MISCELLANY POEM, V. 138.

(66) Corrupted in modern copies into 'we'll range and we'll rove.' The reading in the text is the old reading. The phrase occurs in several old songs.

(67) We should, probably, read 'he.'

(70) This is the only instance of this peculiar form in the present version. The miners in the Marienberg invariably said 'for to' wherever the preposition 'to' occurred before a verb.

    1    2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  
popular articles

    tags

    hotcontroltelevisionlovesciencefamilymaphealthworldnewsartfamilywaytwocomputernewsmeatpersonlawtelevisionyearknowledgebirdmethodlovesoftwaresystemcontrolnaturefood

    0.2234s , 9695.6015625 kb

    Copyright © 2023 Powered by The universe-and every thing in it—exists in singu-lar,Enshenyizhongwang  

    sitemap

    Top